Is Uber legal in Colombia? The courts never actually answered that — here is what they did decide

Almost every page you will find on this says Uber "won" its case in Colombia. That is not what happened. The Supreme Court threw the case out because the taxi company that brought it waited four years too long to sue. No Colombian court has ruled that Uber's operating model is lawful, and no statute says it is. This page walks through the actual documents — the 2019 order that shut Uber down, the 2020 ruling that undid it, the 2023 Supreme Court judgment, and the bill the government filed and withdrew in 2026 — and then tells you what all of that means when you are standing outside an airport at five in the morning.

The short version

Functionally yes. Permanently settled, no. Uber operates openly, using it will not get you in trouble, and there is still no Colombian statute that authorises app-dispatched private cars as public transport.

Uber did not win on the merits. Both the Bogotá tribunal in 2020 and the Supreme Court in 2023 decided the case on prescripción — a filing deadline. Neither ruled on whether what Uber does is lawful.

Uber did shut down. From 1 February 2020, by its own announcement, after the Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio ordered it to stop. It returned weeks later under a different model.

January 2026 was the closest the question has come to being decided by law, and the bill was withdrawn on 2 February 2026 for redrafting. Not defeated. Redrafting.

The one number that helps you. Every big city publishes a legal taxi minimum. Bogotá $8.000, Medellín $8.300, Cali $7.100, Cartagena $12.250. That is what an app quote is worth measuring against.

The answer, in three sentences

We give the same three every time, because any shorter answer is wrong in one direction or the other.

  • Uber is not clandestine. It operates openly in Colombia, it is registered here, and the government treats it as something to regulate instead of something to raid.
  • Using it will not get you in trouble. Every Colombian enforcement measure and proposal we are aware of has aimed at drivers and at platforms. None has targeted passengers.
  • It is not fully resolved law. There is no statute authorising app-dispatched private cars as public transport, and no court has ruled that the model is lawful. The question is open.

People want a yes or a no, and the position is that both are true of different halves of the question. What follows is the evidence for that, with the documents.

What happened, 2016 to 2026

The whole dispute is one lawsuit, brought by one taxi company, that took seven years to die.

DateWhat happened
21 April 2016Comunicaciones Tech y Transporte S.A. (Cotech), a taxi operator, sues Uber B.V., Uber Technologies Inc. and Uber Colombia S.A.S. for unfair competition.
20 December 2019The Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio rules against Uber at first instance and orders it to stop providing the transport service.
10 January 2020Uber announces it will comply: "a partir de las 0:00 del 1° de febrero de 2020 Uber dejará de funcionar en Colombia". It calls the decision arbitrary and says it will appeal.
1 February 2020Uber stops operating in Colombia. This happened; it was not a threat.
February 2020Uber returns, weeks later, under a vehicle-rental-with-driver model, not the previous one. Press reporting.
18 June 2020The Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogotá, Sala Séptima Civil de Decisión, revokes the SIC ruling — on a filing deadline, not on the merits.
10 October 2023The Corte Suprema de Justicia, in SC370-2023, confirms the outcome on the same ground and ends the case.
20 January 2026The Ministerio de Transporte and the Superintendencia de Transporte file Proyecto de Ley 347 de 2026. Press reporting.
2 February 2026The government withdraws the bill for redrafting. Press reporting.

Read that sequence again and notice what is missing from it: at no point does any court or any law say that Uber's way of operating is permitted.

Why "Uber won" is the wrong description

This is the part that gets reported badly, and it is the part that decides how much weight you should put on the rest.

The Bogotá tribunal's ruling of 18 June 2020, in expediente 110013199001201602106 03, says in its operative paragraph:

"Primero. Revocar la sentencia de 20 de diciembre de 2019… y, en su lugar, declarar probada la excepción de prescripción extintiva propuesta por la parte demandada; en consecuencia, se declara terminado el proceso."

Prescripción extintiva is a time bar. Under article 23 of Ley 256 de 1996, an unfair competition claim expires two years after the claimant identifies the alleged infringer. The court found Cotech knew what Uber was doing in 2012 and 2013 and did not sue until 21 April 2016. The claim was dead before it was filed.

The Supreme Court agreed, in SC370-2023 of 10 October 2023 — magistrado ponente Aroldo Wilson Quiroz Monsalvo, radicado 11001-31-99-001-2016-02106-01. Same ground: the claim had prescribed.

What this means in plain terms. Imagine suing your neighbour over a wall they built, and the judge dismissing it because you left it eight years. That does not make the wall legal. It makes your case late. Uber's position in Colombia rests substantially on the fact that the taxi industry missed a deadline in 2014, and nothing since has replaced it with an actual ruling on the merits.

The Supreme Court did add one substantive observation, and it is the closest thing to a judicial statement in Uber's favour that exists in Colombia:

"El uso de los avances de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación no puede calificarse como medio desleal para desviar clientes, pues desconocería un derecho humano reconocido por múltiples instrumentos internacionales."

Using technology to attract customers is not by itself unfair competition. That is a meaningful principle, and it is also not the same as saying the transport service is lawfully provided. The Court did not say that, because it did not have to.

What the law says, and what it does not

Colombia's transport law draws a hard line between servicio público and servicio particular. Public transport — carrying people for payment — is a regulated activity: the vehicle, the driver and the company all need authorisations, and the fare is set by the relevant authority, which is why every city issues a taxi tariff decree each year.

Nothing in that framework contemplates a private car dispatched by an app. The framework predates the technology by about two decades. That is the gap, and it is why:

  • Cities keep publishing taxi tariffs that apps do not follow, because apps are not taxis.
  • Drivers get stopped and vehicles get immobilised in some places and not others, because enforcement is local and discretionary.
  • The national government keeps trying to legislate, most recently in January 2026.
  • Nobody can give you a document that says it is fine, because no such document exists.

We are a transport company, not a law firm, and we will not pretend to give you a legal opinion. What we can tell you is what we work with every day: the rules that govern our vehicles and drivers are specific, written down and checkable, and the rules that govern a rideshare car are not.

The bill that nearly settled it

On 20 January 2026 the Ministerio de Transporte and the Superintendencia de Transporte filed Proyecto de Ley 347 de 2026, setting out a régimen sancionatorio del sector transporte. As reported, it proposed:

  • Fines on drivers of up to $4.700.000 for a single trip.
  • Immobilisation of the vehicle for up to 120 days.
  • Sanctions above $2.100.000.000 in categories that previously had no specific penalty.

It was withdrawn on 2 February 2026, thirteen days after it was filed. Luis Gabriel Serna, head of the Superintendencia's legal office, gave the reason as: "El Gobierno nacional decidió retirarlo para hacer algunos ajustes al articulado, de tal manera que transmita mayor claridad a la opinión pública."

Two caveats. Everything in this section is press reporting — El Colombiano, Forbes Colombia and Semana — and not a document we can send you to on a government site. And the outlets did not render the driver penalty identically; at least one expressed it in minimum salaries, not pesos. We publish the $4.700.000 figure because it is the most consistently reported, and we say that reported figures varied instead of smoothing over it.

Withdrawn for adjustment is not the same as defeated. If you are reading this some months after we wrote it, the position may have moved, and the place to check is the Ministerio de Transporte and the Superintendencia de Transporte, not a travel page.

What a taxi legally costs, city by city

Here is the practical half, and it is the part that helps you decide something.

Every major Colombian city sets its taxi tariff by decree, annually. Those numbers are public, they are enforceable, and they give you a benchmark an app quote can be measured against. Nobody publishes them side by side, so we have:

CityCarrera mínima 2026Set by
Cartagena$12.250Decreto 0051 de 2026 (press)
Medellín$8.300Alcaldía de Medellín, effective 2 February 2026 (official)
Bogotá$8.000Decreto Distrital 042 de 2026, in force 12 February 2026 (official)
Cali$7.100Decreto 4112.010.20.1084 de 2025 (press)

Cartagena's minimum is 72% higher than Cali's. That is not a typo and it is not inflation — it is four separate municipal authorities running four separate cost studies and arriving at four different answers. It is also why advice written about one Colombian city is close to useless in another.

Bogotá publishes the most detail, so it is worth having in full: banderazo $4.500, unit $159 per 100 metres, a night surcharge of $3.800 between 20:00 and 5:00 and on Sundays and holidays, $1.400 for door-to-door, and $8.000 to or from the airport. The factor de excelencia rates run slightly above each of those.

Two of these four cities would not serve us the decree itself — Cartagena's and Cali's municipal sites blocked us — so those two figures reach you through regional press reporting of the decree, and we would rather tell you that than imply we read the document.

Airports, where this bites

If the legal question is ever going to cost you something, it will be at an airport, and for a reason that has nothing to do with law.

Airports are controlled sites. Each terminal authorises particular ground transport companies to work the kerb, and a rideshare driver arriving to collect you is in an ambiguous position that the driver, not you, has to manage. In practice that produces a predictable set of behaviours: being asked to walk out to a specific spot, being asked to sit in the front, cancellations, and long waits at unsociable hours when few drivers want a job that takes them far from the city with no return fare.

The geography differs enormously and it decides how much this matters:

  • Cartagena — the airport is ten minutes from the historic centre, by the airport's own description. The stakes are low; use whatever arrives.
  • Bogotá — El Dorado is in the city, but the city is very large and the traffic is the variable, not the distance.
  • Medellín — the airport is in Rionegro, a different municipality, up a mountain and through a toll tunnel. This is the trip where an app is least reliable and being stranded costs the most.
  • Cali — the airport is in Palmira, and the legal taxi fare is split between two municipal authorities, so there is no single published number to check a quote against at all.

Our own position is not neutral and we will state it plainly: we sell the alternative. What we would say even if we did not is that a ten-minute daytime arrival is not worth planning around, and a pre-dawn departure with luggage and a flight to catch is.

Your city

The national picture above is the same everywhere. Everything that affects a journey — the tariff, the airport, the local enforcement mood — is municipal. We have written the detail out city by city:

  • Uber in Bogotá — how it works at El Dorado, and the 2026 tariff in full.
  • Uber in Medellín — the published $132.000 airport fare, and the toll tunnel it crosses.
  • Uber in Cartagena — the country's shortest airport run and its highest minimum fare.
  • Uber in Cali — the airport fare that two different governments set.

And if you are leaving the city and not crossing it, that is a different decision again. No app will take you four hours and wait: Bogotá to the Coffee Region, Medellín to Cartagena, Cartagena to Santa Marta and Cali to Popayán are all full-day drives we quote as private transfers because there is no other accurate way to quote them.

Common questions

Is Uber legal in Colombia?

Functionally yes, permanently settled no. It operates openly and using it will not get you in trouble, but no Colombian statute authorises app-dispatched private cars as public transport and no court has ruled that the model is lawful.

Did Uber win its court case in Colombia?

Not on the merits. The Bogotá tribunal in June 2020 and the Corte Suprema in SC370-2023 both ended the case on prescripción — the taxi company that sued had known about Uber since 2012 or 2013 and did not file until April 2016, past the two-year limit in article 23 of Ley 256 de 1996. The courts never reached the question of legality.

Was Uber ever banned in Colombia?

Yes, briefly. The Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio ordered it to cease on 20 December 2019, and Uber stopped operating at midnight on 1 February 2020 by its own announcement. It returned within weeks under a different model, and the order was revoked that June.

Will I get fined for taking an Uber?

We are not aware of any Colombian enforcement measure or proposal that has targeted passengers. Every version has aimed at drivers and at platforms, including the January 2026 bill. What you risk is a cancelled ride.

Why do drivers ask me to sit in the front?

Because a passenger in the back of a private car looks like a fare and a passenger in the front looks like a friend. It is about the driver's exposure near taxi ranks and controlled areas, not about you, and it is common enough to be unremarkable.

What happened to the 2026 law?

Proyecto de Ley 347 de 2026 was filed on 20 January 2026 by the Ministerio de Transporte and the Superintendencia de Transporte and withdrawn on 2 February for redrafting, with the government saying it wanted the wording to be clearer. It was not defeated, and a revised version may return.

How much should a taxi cost?

At minimum: $8.000 in Bogotá, $8.300 in Medellín, $7.100 in Cali, $12.250 in Cartagena, under each city's 2026 decree. Short trips inside a city usually land on the minimum, so those numbers are the fair benchmark for an app quote.

Is Uber safer than a taxi in Colombia?

Neither is a category. An app gives you a recorded trip, a plate to check and a driver you can rate. A taxi gives you a regulated fare and a vehicle with a licence. A booked private transfer gives you a named driver and a car somebody is accountable for. They fail in different ways, and the plain answer is that what protects you is the same in all three: check the plate, wait indoors, keep the trip on the record.

Which apps operate in Colombia?

Uber, Cabify, DiDi and InDrive are the names you will hear. We will not publish a table claiming which of them serves which city this month, because coverage changes and a stale table is worse than none. Install them and look.

The version with none of this in it. A named driver, a vehicle you have been told about in advance, a price agreed before you travel with tolls included, and somebody who waits when the flight is late. Airport transfers in every city above, and the long intercity drives an app will not do. That is what we sell, and this page is the argument for it we would rather make with documents than adjectives.

Sources

  • Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Civil, sentencia SC370-2023 of 10 October 2023 — magistrado ponente Aroldo Wilson Quiroz Monsalvo, radicado 11001-31-99-001-2016-02106-01, Comunicaciones Tech y Transporte S.A. (Cotech) against Uber B.V., Uber Technologies Inc. and Uber Colombia S.A.S. Decided on prescription under article 23 of Ley 256 de 1996, not on the lawfulness of Uber's operating model; Cotech had knowledge in 2012–2013 and filed on 21 April 2016. Includes "El uso de los avances de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación no puede calificarse como medio desleal para desviar clientes, pues desconocería un derecho humano reconocido por múltiples instrumentos internacionales." Published by the Court.
  • Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogotá, Sala Séptima Civil de Decisión, fallo of 18 June 2020, expediente 110013199001201602106 03 — "Primero. Revocar la sentencia de 20 de diciembre de 2019… y, en su lugar, declarar probada la excepción de prescripción extintiva propuesta por la parte demandada; en consecuencia, se declara terminado el proceso." Published in the Bogotá district legal archive.
  • Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio — first-instance ruling of 20 December 2019 ordering Uber to cease providing the transport service, as recorded in both judgments above.
  • Uber newsroom, 10 January 2020"a partir de las 0:00 del 1° de febrero de 2020 Uber dejará de funcionar en Colombia", given as compliance with the SIC ruling of 20 December 2019, with Uber describing the decision as arbitrary and stating it would appeal.
  • Secretaría Distrital de Movilidad de Bogotá — Decreto Distrital 042 de 2026, in force 12 February 2026: banderazo $4.500, unidad $159 per 100 metres, carrera mínima $8.000, airport surcharge $8.000, night surcharge $3.800 between 20:00 and 5:00 and on Sundays and holidays, door-to-door $1.400, with higher factor de excelencia rates.
  • Alcaldía de Medellín, announcement of 30 January 2026, effective 2 February 2026 — carrera mínima $8.300, and Medellín to José María Córdova at $132.000 for a basic taxi.
  • Press — El Universal, 27 February 2026, reporting Decreto 0051 de 2026 of the Alcaldía de Cartagena: carrera mínima $12.250. Press instead of the decree, which the Alcaldía's site would not serve us.
  • Press — El País (Cali) and El Tiempo reporting Decreto 4112.010.20.1084 de 2025: carrera mínima $7.100. Press, not the decree, for the same reason.
  • Press — El Colombiano (2 February 2026), Forbes Colombia (3 February 2026) and Semana on Proyecto de Ley 347 de 2026: filed 20 January 2026 by the Ministerio de Transporte and the Superintendencia de Transporte; driver fines reported at up to $4.700.000 per trip, immobilisation up to 120 days, sanctions above $2.100.000.000 where no specific fine existed; withdrawn 2 February 2026, with Luis Gabriel Serna of the Superintendencia's legal office quoted as saying "El Gobierno nacional decidió retirarlo para hacer algunos ajustes al articulado, de tal manera que transmita mayor claridad a la opinión pública." Reported renderings of the driver penalty varied between outlets.
  • Press — Portafolio, Semana and El Tiempo, February 2020, on Uber's return to Colombia under a vehicle-rental-with-driver model. Press and not an official filing.
  • Aeropuerto Internacional Rafael Núñez, official site — the airport described as ten minutes from Cartagena's historic centre.